Never lose an account to an alert nobody acted on.
Churn prevention software.
The moment risk fires, the account goes to one named owner with a root cause call due in 48 hours, an approval at 24 and the manager looped at day 5.
How does GainTrace stop an account from churning?
One Wobbling Account, One Save Motion, Not Five Alerts
This is the reason CS teams stop trusting automation. An account dips, recovers, dips again, and the platform files a fresh task each time until the queue is noise and the team clears it in bulk. GainTrace enrolls the account instead of alerting it, so the account is either in the save motion or it is not.
Every Risk Becomes One Named Person's Job
The Churn-Risk Save Motion opens a root-cause call for the company owner, due in two days at urgent priority, then holds any concession behind an approval gate with a 24-hour SLA.
The Save Play Is Already Written. You Did Not Hire Anyone To Write It.
The reason most teams never run a save motion is not that they disagree about the steps. It is that somebody has to build it, and that somebody is a CS Ops admin a team under fifty never hired. Four risk plays start working the day your CRM finishes syncing.
How does GainTrace help a CSM save an at-risk account?
One Wobbling Account, One Save Motion, Not Five Alerts
- A flapping usage signal cannot manufacture a second task on an account already being worked
- An account that already came through the motion is not dragged back into it
- An expansion nudge cannot land on an account while its save motion is still open
- Playbooks & Flows sets out exactly how that guarantee is held
One open run per account, never two
ExampleThe account is in the motion, or it is not. There is no third state.
Every Risk Becomes One Named Person's Job
- A person, by name, owns the account within two days. Not the team, not the queue.
- Nobody discounts their way out of a renewal on their own authority
- Work that stalls is chased by the system, not by whoever happens to notice
- Every save closes on what actually happened, so next quarter you can argue with the record
Risk fired, and became one person's job
ExampleOwner at 48 hours, approval at 24, manager at day 5
The Save Play Is Already Written. You Did Not Hire Anyone To Write It.
- Nothing to design before the first save motion runs on a real account
- Change what counts as risk by describing it, not by learning a formula language
- Try a change against real accounts before it can touch a customer
- Playbooks & Flows lists all nineteen and what each one fires on
Start from a template, switch it on
ExampleLive the day your CRM finishes syncing, with nobody hired
Which other problems run on the same account data?
Common questions about churn prevention
Ordered by how often it comes up.
Do we need a CS Ops admin to build these save playbooks?
Your alerts and plays will become noise my CSMs learn to ignore. Why is this different?
What stops a save task from quietly slipping?
How long before it is actually doing something?
It costs about what another CSM costs. What does this run for a team our size?
How do I justify the payback with no results to point at?
We already run a CS platform. What does moving actually cost us?
Where does our data live, and are you SOC 2?
Every at-risk account becomes one named person's job, the moment the risk fires.
Six risk and escalation plays inside a 19-playbook library, no duplicate runs on the same account, a manager escalation when an action sits idle, and no admin to hire.
Free to start · no credit card required.